Frédéric Chapoton <fchapot...@gmail.com> writes: > I have found the following wrong behaviour on sage 4.8, without sage-combinat > > sage: P=DiGraph([[0,1]]) > sage: Q=P.cartesian_product(P) > sage: len(Q.edges()) > 0 > > The result is a disconnected union of 4 points. > This should be a directed square, with 4 edges. > > Maybe this is not the right place to ask.. Or maybe this has been corrected in > 5.0 beta* ?
I can confirm that it still produces the same result on 5.0.beta10. BTW I think this could equally correctly have been posted in sage-devel if you so desired. It would certainly reach a wider audience there. -Keshav ---- Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
