> In other words, something like this: > > sage: w.inversions() > [alpha[1], alpha[1] + alpha[2], alpha[2]] > > sage: w.inversions(reflections=True) > [s1,s1*s2*s1,s2]
+1 what was again the point of having a list rather than a set? Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
