On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:12 AM, <msh...@math.vt.edu> wrote: > Nicolas, > > The queue applies now :) > >> I am about to push another reviewer's patch which fixes some little >> documentation compilation errors. > > I'll fold it in. Thanks! > >> By the way: ``apply_demazure_simple_reflection`` does the same as >> ``apply_simple_projection``, right? > > Yes. I never looked at this method because it sounds different > than what I was doing. I want to change the option > "toward_max" to "length_increasing". Will anyone be bothered by this?
"toward_max" is used in /categories/coxeter_groups.py /monoids/bi_hecke_monoid.py /combinat/j_trivial_monoids.py I would also vote for "length_increasing" but we would have to change it in the various places. > If not I will delete apply_demazure_simple_reflection > and use apply_simple_projection instead, with the renamed > option length_increasing. +1 Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
