Hi Nicolas,

On 2013-03-01, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
>> Altogether, I would aim toward having EndomorphismSubring only inherit
>> from the concrete class HomsetWithBase, unless it *really* needs some
>> of the speed critical methods of Ring. Or unless, in the short run, it
>> depends too much from stuff in Ring that has not yet been moved up,
>> and moving that stuff up would be too much hassle.
>
> Hm. Worth trying, at least.

I did try. But implementing the new coercion framework and the category
framework in sage.modular.... is a can of worms and beyond my scope.

Hence, I think I will leave it at a partial cythonisation.

Yours,
Simon

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to