I am finished with coding. Is there a way to test only latex output? I'd 
rather avoid testing all routines. I'll upload a patch to  
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13735 as soon as I'll get an 
account on trac.sagemath.org 

Dne čtvrtek, 4. dubna 2013 16:14:07 UTC+2 Vít Tuček napsal(a):
>
> Thanks. I am looking into it. Is it possible that some nonzero coefficient 
> c has representation by string "0"? For the moment I am assuming no.
>
> Dne čtvrtek, 4. dubna 2013 13:40:05 UTC+2 Travis Scrimshaw napsal(a):
>>
>> Hey Vit,
>>    I believe the ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13735 is 
>> the same problem. Currently it needs someone to do work on it. (There's 
>> also the related ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13356.)
>>
>> Best,
>> Travis
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 11:01:12 PM UTC-4, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>>>
>>>         Dear Vít, 
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 12:40:50PM -0700, Vít Tuček wrote: 
>>> >     The title says it all. 
>>> >    testcase: 
>>> >    sage: latex(RootSystem("A2").ambient_space().simple_root(1)) 
>>> >     
>>> >    e_{0} + \left(-1\right)e_{1} 
>>> >    expected output: 
>>> >    e_{0} - e_{1} 
>>> >    Of course it should work also for weights and should be capable of 
>>> >    producing output like 
>>> >    -3e_{1}+e_{2} 
>>> >    Best regards 
>>> >                         Vit 
>>> >    P.S.: I am not familiar with sage and its internals but I've 
>>> checked 
>>> >    misc.py/repr_lincomb and it seemed fine at a first glance. Do the 
>>> test 
>>> >    cover also linear combinantions with negative coefficients? 
>>> Documentation 
>>> >    for repr_lincomb seems to show only terms with positive 
>>> coefficients. 
>>>
>>> I was annoyed recently as well by repr_lincom not handling negative 
>>> coefficients nicely (which I had never noticed before; maybe something 
>>> was changed recently?). 
>>>
>>> Please open a ticket on: 
>>>
>>>         http://trac.sagemath.org/ 
>>>
>>> You are very welcome to submit a patch with an improved version. In 
>>> case you have not yet contributed to Sage, please checkout the 
>>> developer's guide and feel free to ask for help: 
>>>
>>>         http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/ 
>>>
>>> Cheers, 
>>>                                 Nicolas 
>>> -- 
>>> Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nth...@users.sf.net> 
>>> http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ 
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to