> > I wouldn't necessarily call that a bug, as it is necessary since A == B. > > four people, two options, five opinions...
Let me ask this, is being a k-core a property of a partition or is it a > *distinct* combinatorial object? > As mathematical concepts, that doesn't make much of a difference, I'd say. It is just too easy to think of something written as [4,2,1,1] at the same time as a partition, a list, a composition, a core, ... On the other hand, sagewise, if being a k-core is only a property of a partition, why do their methods differ that much? do some methods even have different results depending on the type of core? As it seems this is the case, I do think of a core as a different combinatorial object. just my 2 cents... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
