Hi Darij, On 2013-12-22, Darij Grinberg <darijgrinb...@gmail.com> wrote: > sage: Qt = PolynomialRing(QQ, 't') > sage: t = Qt.gen() > sage: SymmetricFunctions(Qt).kschur(3) > 3-bounded Symmetric Functions over Univariate Polynomial Ring in t > over Rational Field in the 3-Schur basis > > Now this, of course, takes longer than the old syntax (although > there's a way to merge the first two lines into one; I just never > remember it).
Very easy and intuitive: sage: Qt.<t> = QQ[] But do you really need Qt and t here? Otherwise, sage: SymmetricFunctions(QQ['t']).kschur(3) might be easier to type. Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
