On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 03:48:37PM +0200, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Nicolas, I can swear that in the mind of somebody who never had anything
> to do with categories, there is no link whatsoever between finding those
> sets and the function "one()". When you know the answer already, it is
> very easy to find it again. When you don't, you spend minuteson things
> like this, and sometimes you even give up.
That's why I had also mentioned ``C??``. But you are right, I should
have mentioned the reasoning behind: I need to access the underlying
sets. In the methods that are available in C, is there one that is
likely to have the same need that I could copy from. I personally
thought about 'one' since we were in the context of monoids (I may
have some personal bias too :-)). Maybe another more natural one is
an_element (how can I build an_element of a cartesian product? Well,
take an_element in the underlying sets and piece them together).
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
