Hey Mike, We had the problem for Lyndon words (http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12997), but it was hacked around. So either we fix _sfc/_simple_fixed_content or we hack around it by stripping leading 0's and then modifying the yielded elements (by adding # leading 0's).
Best, Travis On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 1:20:27 PM UTC-8, Mike Zabrocki wrote: > > I was double checking a problem from my combinatorics class (we are doing > PĆ³lya enumeration) and I came across what I think is a bug in the > necklaces.py code. > > I'll open a ticket, but I want to double check in case someone knows more > about this code than I do. > > sage: Necklaces([0,2,1]).list() > [[1, 2, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1, 3, 2]] > sage: Necklaces([0,2,1]).cardinality() > 1 > > I think that while the second answer is correct, the first one should > return [[2, 3, 3]]. > > The only problem that I can see is that code seems to not be written to > handle input vectors that have 0 entries. The documentation needs to be > modernized a bit. > > -Mike > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.