On Wednesday 29 August 2007 07:19, mabshoff wrote: > ==22784== 791,674 bytes in 65,421 blocks are definitely lost in loss > record 2,472 of 2,481 > ==22784== at 0x4A05CB9: operator new[](unsigned long) > (vg_replace_malloc.c:199) > ==22784== by 0x9280247: ZZ_pX_repr (in /tmp/Work2/sage-2.8.3.alpha2/ > local/lib/libcsage.so.0.0.0)
I think you also have a similar memory leak in number fields. I'm going to fix that one as soon as the c_lib gets integrated in to the main tree and the new code for the sage c_lib gets added which provides support for the proper fix. The trac for the c_lib integration is http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/411 Perhaps this should be in milestone 2.8.3 -- Joel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
