On Friday 12 October 2007 11:41, didier deshommes wrote: > But: > > coeff(f,y,0); > > x + 1 > > returns the right answer > > Actually I like Maple's notation better here over the dictionary > notation you proposed: it is as intuitive and I have to type less > curly braces to get the same result :)
Ok, that's a good reason, but what if I was working in something like this?: sage: P.<x,y,z>=ZZ[] sage: f=x*y^2*z^3+y^2*z sage: f.coefficient(y,2,z,3) # I want the "coefficient" of y^2*z^3 # Bang That doesn't seem very nice to me. -- Joel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
