Le lundi 7 décembre 2020 à 15:01:58 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit :
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 10:02 AM Eric Gourgoulhon <egourg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Le lundi 7 décembre 2020 à 10:57:22 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > >> > >> Indeed, this is currently the major drawback of Sage's three.js viewer: > it cannot generate png images in an automatized way (in interactive mode, > there is no problem: it suffices to click on "Save as PNG" in the three.js > menu). As a consequence, all the 3D plots shown at > https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/plot3d/sage/plot/plot3d/plot3d.html > > are generated with jsmol. A drawback here is that these images do not > correspond to what the end user will get in his Sage session. > > > > > > Moreover these 3d images are static; it would be nice to have (at least > some of) them interactive, as in > > https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/plot3d/threejs.html > > I am confused now - how on Earth the latter interactive plots were > produced then, if not with threejs used within Sage? > Why can't this technique be used with other plots ? > These interactive plots have not been automatically generated while building the doc, but have been prepared by hand and are stored in src/doc/en/reference/plot3d/threejs_examples They are included into the doc by src/doc/en/reference/plot3d/threejs.rst -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/bce513ff-6dd9-43c5-aa4b-d209146198c7n%40googlegroups.com.
