On Mar 29, 2021 5:26 PM, Matthias Koeppe <matthiaskoe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Monday, March 29, 2021 at 6:25:28 AM UTC-7 vdelecroix wrote:
>>
>> I think it is desirable to have the possibility to enable or disable
>> cysignals manually. In other words
>> enable + "no cysignals present" -> error
>> enable + "cysignals present" -> compilation with sigs
>> disable + "whatever" -> compilation without sigs
I misunderstood this.
>
>
> This suggestion is not compatible with modern Python packaging (PEP-517/518). There is no such thing as an "optional build dependency".
>
Is it acceptable to build different versions depending on whether a package is found?
In the end the sig_block/sig_unblock is a bit of overkill anyway for MemoryAllocator. I wouldn't consider it clean to allocate memory with it inside of sig_on / sig_off.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/6u1VuXJE7wE/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/c8cff2c8-6c9c-46e7-a9e8-9d5cf390aac8n%40googlegroups.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/6061fe6d.1c69fb81.dd754.767a%40mx.google.com.
