My question is: why "make" does not build openblas first and then gsl, instead of forcing me to do this manually?
On Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 6:03:15 PM UTC+9 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Hi, > > I started to build the latest Sage 9.5.beta2 from some old Sage > installation on Mac. Then it failed while building "gsl" complaining > missing "openblas" library. I could overcome the problem by issuing "sage > -i openblas". I went through this twice on two Sage installations on the > same machine. > > But my question is: if openblas is a requirement of building gsl, then why > "make" build openblas first and then gsl, instead of forcing me to do this > manually? I guess there is a bug in the make script... > > Thank you for attention. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/010c54f8-3ade-41ba-aee8-83e7985c0832n%40googlegroups.com.
