-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David, thanks for bringing up the interaction with #2274. Mercurial will definitely *not* like to merge the two doc patches, since I've made some changes in the coding theory section (in the histogram example, for instance, which we both noticed was lacking a few lines of code to work...)
I think it will be fairly easy for me to take 435.patch and merge it with #2289, and just resubmit the patch for #2289. But there is also the matter of the other patch in #2274 (8672.patch), which should be reviewed by someone. I would like to wait for that if possible, just in case some changes are needed in 435.patch. Best, Alex David Joyner wrote: | Thanks very much Alex. It is a big help. | | But there is already a patch to const.tex still waiting review. | (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/2274/435.patch) | | Someone should merge them. Is this easy to do using mercurial? | If not, I might be able to do it by hand, which now seems to me might be easier | that if Alex redid his changes after applying the above patch. | | Suggestions? | | On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:15 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> Dear Alex and David, |> |> David has been discussing const.tex with me today, and he was almost |> for getting rid of it |> since he was worried a lot about the quality, accuracy, etc. with |> const.tex. Thus I'm |> *VERY HAPPY* Alex that you've jumped in and done a bunch of work on const.tex! |> I think this is exactly what needs to happen to breath new life into |> what I think is a really |> useful document. David -- hopefully you agree and will referee Alex's |> patch asap so |> it can go into sage-2.10.3, which we hope to release this week (?). |> |> -- William |> |> |> |> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- |> From: SAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> Date: Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:08 PM |> Subject: [sage-trac] [SAGE] #2289: [with doc patch, needs review] make |> the constructions document prettier and more consistent |> |> |> To: |> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> |> |> #2289: [with doc patch, needs review] make the constructions document |> prettier and |> more consistent |> - ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ |> Reporter: AlexGhitza | Owner: tba |> Type: defect | Status: new |> Priority: major | Milestone: sage-2.10.3 |> Component: documentation | Keywords: |> - ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ |> The patch is somewhat big but most of the changes are cosmetic, aimed at |> making const.tex more consistent internally (and with the tutorial) and |> prettier to behold. |> |> I've also exposed a number of examples that were %skip-ped previously, |> tested them and fixed a few of them that were buggy. |> |> -- |> Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2289> |> SAGE <http://sagemath.org/> |> Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of |> Reinventing the Wheel |> |> |> |> |> |> -- |> William Stein |> Associate Professor of Mathematics |> University of Washington |> http://wstein.org |> | - -- Alexandru Ghitza Assistant Professor Department of Mathematics Colby College Waterville, ME 04901 http://bayes.colby.edu/~ghitza/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHwZACdZTaNFFPILgRAmBnAJ9MZkRYYRXTuuAagkpRkGhrM7N7gACbBpF3 AN2aUyBatIXrd15CY6KSPFo= =UThJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
