El jueves, 21 de julio de 2022 a las 7:32:59 UTC+2, Nils Bruin escribió:
> In that case, shouldn't sagemath be linking to libflint.so instead of > libflint.so.16 then? That's the thing that seems to be available between > the different versions. Are they not ABI compatible? (or at least in one > direction)? > They are not, that's exactly the point of library soversions. The soversion, if correctly used, is bumped when a release contains some ABI incompatible change that requires a rebuild of consumers. So you can't just link to the .so symlink, that would just defeat the point. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/0ccc2cbe-7570-485e-adac-b53ef69439ddn%40googlegroups.com.
