On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:05 AM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:53 AM, David Harvey wrote: > > >> I'm trying to decide if Sage's new "mathematica manipulate" like > >> functionality should > >> be called "manipulate" or "interact". > > Oh and by the way, it looks way cool. I'm looking forward to playing > with it. >
Thanks. It feels quite clunky "speed wise" compared to Mathematica or Geogebra for *interactive* graphs since you send a whole image every time, but it works cleanly through a web browser (unlike Geogebra which uses Java), it's really easy to use, and it gives you access to the full power of Sage. Also, I'm documenting it, so hopefully some other clever people can help with making it feel much smoother for graphics applications after the first version. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
