Definitely +1 On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 10:32:15 AM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote:
> Would it be a good idea for Sage tarballs, at least the development > versions, to come with `upstream` defined already? With a fresh 10.0.beta6 > tarball: > > % git remote -v > trac https://github.com/sagemath/sagetrac-mirror.git (fetch) > trac ssh://g...@trac.sagemath.org:2222/sage.git > <http://g...@trac.sagemath.org:2222/sage.git> (push) > > Should this also (or instead) define `upstream` as > https://github.com/sagemath/sage.git? > > -- > John > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/80d44b36-b559-4560-9542-8b81a8420ccdn%40googlegroups.com.
