Okay, so I will make a new function named coefficient_monomials and will implement the functionality that Lorenz Panny suggested. Thank you for your help : ) .
On Wednesday, January 10, 2024 at 8:16:25 PM UTC+5:30 Nils Bruin wrote: > On Wednesday 10 January 2024 at 03:03:09 UTC-8 Martin R wrote: > > ... What would be a good name? Brainstorming: `coefficient_system`, > `coefficients`, `coefficients_monomials`, > `coefficient_matrix_monomial_vector`... > > > I think coefficients_monomials() is the most descriptive, as it tells you > what you get back and in what order. > > C, m = PS.coefficients_monomials() > assert PolynomialSequence(C*m) == PS > > (incidentally, the assert also holds true with the return values of > coefficient_matrix) > > Also, thinking about whether C should be transposed: I think it's logical > that the rows of C are the coefficients of members of the sequence (since > matrices are closest to sequences of rows in sage), so C is already correct > in that sense. Therefore, m should indeed be a "column" vector, but sage is > ambivalent about whether vectors are rows or columns and therefore we can > safely return it as a vector. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/7e6e8093-da48-4d87-9f77-8bc931c3b4a3n%40googlegroups.com.
