On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:11 PM Matthias Koeppe <matthiaskoe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 10:49:04 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > 2. Also the large Sage source tarball does not "vendor". It is a shipment > > of a distribution. Distributions don't "vendor". It's the job of a > > distribution to ship its components. > This is not correct. Sage is not a distribution > > > Let's not do "Sage-the-distribution is not a distirbution" again. > https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/3Zoq0CNE1hE/m/tPgFOpHWBwAJ (2023).
I never agreed with William on this one (Sage is too narrow in scope and incomplete to be a distribution), Anaconda calls itself "distribution", Sage is quite far from Anaconda's functionality. Anyway, William concludes with "I hope soon Sage isn't a distribution, but right now it still is. " Do you also hope for the latter? Anyhow, it's just fuzzy terminology, as well as just what exactly "to vendor" means. With the definition of "to vendor" I provided then you got to agree that we vendor a lot of things. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq29Gfat-GOf0UiVrFiOmxRrvo_pp3VmjFrQm0FK8xGfuQ%40mail.gmail.com.
