On 26 February 2024 09:08:08 GMT, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Hi Kwankyu,
>
>I do not agree with
>
>usage 3: Issues that should be fixed as fast as possible
>
>To me it is rather "issues that should be fixed before the next
>release" (or at least it was the way it was supposed to work when we
>had trac). This looks better to me as that there is no reason to
>release a broken sage.
Indeed, +1. Issues to be fixed "as fast as possible" are only critical, or less.
"blocker" normally means "blocking the release, must be fixed".
>
>Best
>Vincent
>
>On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 09:17, Kwankyu Lee <ekwan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, February 26, 2024 at 4:46:36 PM UTC+9 tobia...@gmx.de wrote:
>>
>> Just move "usage 2" to a new label. Would be more intuitive and explicit in
>> my opinion.
>>
>>
>> I am a bit inclined to your opinion, but not sure. Others may argue that
>> "usage 1" and " usage 2" are better to be combined under one label.
>>
>> Anyway, here I am focusing on the (easy) issue of separating "usage 3" from
>> the "blocker" label.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "sage-devel" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/609bd8c5-92dd-4c64-8204-a4956517558an%40googlegroups.com.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/BED14EC4-6EB3-4D3A-9EB8-ADADB4165AFA%40gmail.com.
