On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 15:01 -0700, kcrisman wrote: > > Can someone who is not Dima or Matthias explain to us how it is possible > that they both are claiming to represent the normal Python way of doing > things? There have been numerous statements by both of them about this, > which makes it sound like there are two pieces to it (modularization but > also "de-vendoring"), and I can only assume that it would be possible for > both to occur simultaneously.
It is, but in its current incarnation, the modularization relies heavily on the sage distribution vendoring. Conflict arises because the modularization is cited as a blocker whenever someone wants to pare down or disentangle some aspect of the sage distribution. It's not the modularization per se that we object to. Personally, I would like it to succeed, but not at the expense of everything else. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/df724126d0521bf9eb1275ba961bc1b5355b3af7.camel%40orlitzky.com.
