I don't argue against making them standard - I argue against vendoring them, which buys us essentially nothing but an extra headache.
On 1 June 2024 15:10:21 CEST, Nathan Dunfield <nat...@dunfield.info> wrote: >The six packages proposed for addition are all pure-Python and collectively >take up 4M installed (about a 450K download); for scale, I think a full >Sage installation is about 3G (1.25G download). They all seem to be >well-maintained, and common enough that all are available on conda-forge. >Using pytest to test Sage sounds like a good thing to me, and I think it >makes sense to promote them standard packages. > >Best, > >Nathan > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"sage-devel" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >To view this discussion on the web visit >https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/c5ab0d5a-55c0-4f55-abc1-60b4f23b6ad4n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/A3CBA6CF-2C59-42EA-AB9D-5C5D6FB9EA8A%40gmail.com.
