On Sunday, June 23, 2024 at 3:32:14 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 10:29:12 AM UTC-7 Starx wrote:
This discussion stems from: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/979bdce4e002cd05/e8061b2ff21a4cdf?lnk=gst&q=is_AlgebraElement#e8061b2ff21a4cdf [...] The is_functions (is_Integer, is_AlgebraElement, ect) are depreciated [....] It seems to me that after 4 years they should either go or they shouldn't be depreciated. Another twelve years later, this is almost complete. https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/Sage-10.4-Release-Tour#deprecations One of the last bulk change tickets: "Deprecate is_Ideal, is_LaurentSeries, is_MPolynomialIdeal, is_MPolynomialRing, is_MPowerSeries, is_PolynomialQuotientRing, is_PolynomialRing, is_PolynomialSequence, is_PowerSeries, is_QuotientRing" (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38266, needs review) Any takers for the last few few functions? - is_SymmetricFunction - is_AlphabeticStringMonoidElement etc. - is_FunctionFieldElement, is_FunctionField (slightly more complicated definitions) - should is_GlobalGenus be renamed? - should is_NumberFieldHomsetCodomain be renamed? - is_Infinite - is_LaurentSeriesRing, is_MPowerSeriesRing, is_PowerSeriesRing (slightly more complicated definitions) - is_Ring (it checks against Rings(), nailed in memory) - is_Divisor, is_ChowCycle, is_ToricDivisor, is_CohomologyClass - is_SchemeMorphism (slightly more complicated definition) - is_SchemeTopologicalPoint -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/21374bf1-251d-4dec-bcef-2ecc1c33b720n%40googlegroups.com.
