On Mar 31, 2008, at 8:18 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> By the way, I just did some cyclotomic polynomial benchmarking >> in on Intel Core 2 Duo 2.6Ghz laptop. Here are the results: >> >> n | Sage 2.11 | newcyc at #2654 | PARI | Magma >> 10^5 | 1.29 | 0.37 | 1.24 | 0.02 >> 10^6 | ? | 32.89 | 123.8 | 0.20 >> 10^7 | ? | ? | ? | 2.37 >> >> Magma crushes everything else yet again... > > Fixed up the ZZ[x] constructor, now we crush Magma (I don't feel bad > taking credit 'cause I wrote the original cyclotomic coefficient > code). > > sage: time f = cyclotomic_polynomial(10^5) > CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s > Wall time: 0.00 > sage: time f = cyclotomic_polynomial(10^6) > CPU times: user 0.01 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 0.02 s > Wall time: 0.02 > sage: time f = cyclotomic_polynomial(10^7) > CPU times: user 0.15 s, sys: 0.08 s, total: 0.22 s > Wall time: 0.24 > > sage: time f = cyclotomic_polynomial(next_prime(10^5)) > CPU times: user 0.05 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 0.05 s > Wall time: 0.06 > sage: time f = cyclotomic_polynomial(ZZ.random_element(10^5, 10^6)) > CPU times: user 0.02 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.03 s > Wall time: 0.06 > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2654 mate that's awesome. david --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
