Interesting discussion. Sorry to have misread David Roe's -1: as several people noticed, thanks to gmail's habit of hiding quoted text I mistakenly thought he was disagreeing with me and took umbrage.
David K's suggestions look very sensible to me, and I know that he is speaking from experience of the "rival" system. I agree to leave hermitian things until later; for myself, I want lattices which are f.g. projective modules over more general Dedekind Domains, but that will be a different thing to implement and I will not mess up the current discussion by insisting that we go for such generality right away. John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
