Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote: > In short: for < = in, if it was just me, I would only use the most > absolutely trivial coercions. And in particular avoid there all the > coercions that involve projections and not embedding (like Z -> Z/nZ)
+1 I think the new coercion model in Sage is much too aggressive - especially as applied when coding. As Ralf said: perhaps it makes sense for interactive use. Would it be possible to enable/disable some features dynamically? Regards, Bill Page --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
