On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Florent Hivert <florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr> wrote: > I also like the following one because it has a very high precedence and also > because it reminds XML tags > > [1,2,3] <foo> [1,2,3]
That one is nice; it's very pretty. Unfortunately, it doesn't work with the same implementation, because "A <foo> B" is equivalent to "(A<foo) and (foo>B)". (It could probably work with the original implementation, that stored A inside the global foo; but that doesn't work with (A <foo> (B <foo> C)). Maybe it could work if foo had a stack, where A<foo pushed A on the stack and foo>B popped a value off the stack. That seems like it's getting fairly fragile, though.) (BTW, I think you mean "very low precedence".) Carl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
