On Mar 28, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Martin Raum wrote: > On 27 Mrz., 20:24, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> > wrote: >> It would be very good to cleanup/revise the code in there, but >> beware, it is rather fragile. There has also been discussion to make >> *less* things comparable, so it should probably be done with that in >> mind. >> >> Just curious, did you have a specific use in mind? >> >> - Robert > > Are you aware of any discussion about what should be comparable? > Otherwise I will work our something and post it to Trac. I think this > is the way to do it, isn't it?
Yes. > Actually, there is a use I've got in mind. I've implemented a lazy > ring and space structure for Siegel modular forms using Skoruppa's > code. Now I am unhappy that I have to impose a total order to > efficiently implement equality of forms. Makes sense. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
