Thanks Michael, I was really referring to multiprocessing, since their APIs are not the same and pyprocessing isn't supported anymore. Multiprocessing is maintained to be fully compatible with the 2.6 module to help with forward compatibility.
So I guess the answer to my question is that Multiprocessing won't be in 3.4.1, right? That's fine I can always import it from an egg. Flávio On 22 abr, 17:25, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Apr 22, 8:09 am, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:10 AM,FlavioCoelho <fccoe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > is it too late to include the multiprocessing package into sage > > > 3.4.1? > > > No, since we included it in Sage a year ago: > > While we ship pyprocessing we should really consider upgrading to > multiprocessing since once we update to Python 2.6 we can just drop > the spkg and it contains fixes not in pyprocessing, i.e. I could never > get pyprocessing to work on FreeBSD. > > > teragon:~ wstein$ sage > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > | Sage Version 3.4.1, Release Date: 2009-04-21 | > > | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. | > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > sage:import processing > > sage: > > > > There is a backport of it for python 2.5 in Pypi, which is maintained > > > by the author of the one which figures in the standard library from > > > 2.6 on. > > > > thanks, > > > > Flávio > > Cheers, > > Michael > > > -- > > William Stein > > Associate Professor of Mathematics > > University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
