On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM, William Stein<wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jason Grout<jason-s...@creativetrax.com> > wrote: >> >> William Stein wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On sage.math, I installed sage-4.0.2.alpha3, then installed all >>> optional spkg's into it. All official optional spkg's do install fine >>> on sage.math. Also, on sage.math, all reasonable optional commercial >>> math software is also installed (I even have a legal magma in my home >>> directory). I then ran sage -t -long --optional on the tree, and >>> 118 doctests fail in 53 different files. So that's at least 53 new >>> bugs now, just because we haven't been running #optional doctests. >>
I've now reported most of the #optional failures to trac, trying to group them together. It's definitely the case that any code not tested is almost certainly broken. For example, almost every single section of the Sage constructions guide has many #optional doctest failures. Essentially all the interfaces have failures. The magma interface has a lot of problems now, etc., etc. But at least there are trac tickets for all this. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
