Hi Peter, On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Peter Jeremy<peterjer...@optushome.com.au> wrote: > What is the policy regarding Cc'ing "SPKG Maintainers" and/or "Upstream > Contacts" in trac tickets? There's nothing in TracGuidelines about it > but I've had a Maintainer get upset that he wasn't Cc'd on a ticket.
I don't think there's any official policy on CC'ing spkg maintainers. However, I think it's courteous to do so. As regards upstream contacts, some of them do not have trac accounts. And for those upstream contacts who do have trac accounts, if their trac usernames are not listed on the trac wiki page, then it can be tricky to get their username mapped to real name. If in doubt I would ask around on sage-devel as you have done. > (And, in relation to recent, popular thread, there's also nothing about > how trac attachments should be named). If I remember correctly, one widely agreed upon naming scheme for trac attachments and patches is as follows: trac_xxxx-<description>.patch where "xxxx" should be replaced with the ticket number. Some folks use a different naming scheme, but I usually stick with the above scheme. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
