I would also add that MMA is more powerful at solving equations and finding roots. E.g. the Reduce[] command in MMA. Even MMA's Solve[] finds solutions where Sage (or Maxima) does not. But I suppose that this is not a fundamental disadvantage of Sage, as it is just a matter of implementing better algorithms.
Stan Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > I made a few changes to the Wikipedia page, > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sage_(mathematics_software) > > to push the 'features' further up the list. I also added a section on > advantages/disadvantages of Sage. Just sticking advantages will lead to > their deletion, as it wont be a neutral point of view. > > I'd like to get similar information on the Wikipedia pages for the 3 M's > too, but it needs to be objective. > > Jon McLoone is a Wolfram Research employee who is an advertising manager > > http://members.wolfram.com/jonm/ > > he goes over the Wikipedia page with a fine tooth comb, so any > comparisons with Sage need to be objective. (He will probably try to get > them deleted anyway), but IMHO, a Wikipedia page on Mathematica should > list alternatives, in the same way I've stuck on the Sage page. But as I > say, these need to be objective. > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
