On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:00 PM, William Stein<[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Robert Miller<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> All known issues have been fixed, and all long doctests pass on >> sage.math (* -- see below), so there is a chance this could be >> sage-4.1. >> >> The source tarball: >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc1.tar >> >> sage.math binary: >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc1-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz >> >> Upgrade URL: >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc1/ > > A just remembered that a show-stopping blocker before we can release > 4.1 is that the secure notebook is still totally broken in > sage-4.1.rc1 (secure=False). See below. > > This is http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6408 and it was > something that I reported and made a *blocker* over 2 weeks ago. I > think it was a mistake for the release manager to close the 4.1 > milestone and move this blocker to 4.1.1. We have to close all > blockers before finishing a release. Fortunately, I caught this > before we made the official release.
I have re-opened the 4.1.1 milestone and made #6408 a blocker against it. I demoted some singular itanium "blocker" to not a blocker, since it is purely a performance issue, so shouldn't be a blocker. What about http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6374? There is a patch up from 3 weeks ago, craigcitro (I guess) considers it a blocker. Is it a blocker? Also, what about http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6398 This is listed as a blocker. However, it isn't even a problem now -- somebody fixed it. So I've marked it against 4.1 and closed it. Finally, on an unloaded PPC OS X box I get: sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py" sh: kpsewhich: command not found sh: kpsewhich: command not found /Users/wstein/build/sage-4.1.rc1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/misc/misc.py:1901: DeprecationWarning: functions overriding warnings.showwarning() must support the 'line' argument warn(message, DeprecationWarning, stacklevel=3) ********************************************************************** File "/Users/wstein/build/sage-4.1.rc1/devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py", line 2876: sage: E.division_polynomial(3).roots(CC,multiplicities=False) Expected: [-2.88288879135334, 1.39292799513138, 0.078313731444316... - 0.492840991709879*I, 0.078313731444316... + 0.492840991709879*I] Got: [-2.88288879135335, 1.39292799513138, 0.0783137314443168 - 0.492840991709879*I, 0.0783137314443168 + 0.492840991709879*I] ********************************************************************** 1 items had failures: 1 of 22 in __main__.example_61 ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file /Users/wstein/build/sage-4.1.rc1/tmp/.doctest_ell_rational_field.py [1250.1 s] Does anybody have any idea what is up with that? So we're basically good for 4.1, except for the *major* show stopper notebook bug. - William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
