On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Marshall Hampton<hampto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for pointing that out. I am somewhat disturbed by the positive > review for that becoming a standard package, which seems inconsistent
I don't know where you got that. I was the reviewer and I clearly said "Positive review from me as far as I can tell, as an optional package." > with previous policy. In #6663 I am merely suggesting 4ti2 and glpk > as experimental packages, with the idea of transitioning them to > optional, and then maybe standard eventually. > > Just to be clear, I have felt that in the past the hurdle for becoming > a standard package is too high. I just want the process to be > consistent. > > -Marshall > > On Jul 31, 4:51 pm, Willem Jan Palenstijn <w...@usecode.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 01:18:58PM -0700, Marshall Hampton wrote: >> >> > I agree, that doesn't sound good. At the moment, I just want to check >> > out the sandpile functionality, so I don't think I will wade in and >> > try to improve glpk, or bug the author to do so. >> >> > On the positive side, I think I now have packages that install >> > correctly, at least on my own mac. They are at: >> >> >http://www.d.umn.edu/~mhampton/4ti2.p0.spkg >> >http://www.d.umn.edu/~mhampton/glpk.p0.spkg >> >> > i.e. I have overwritten my previous broken versions. >> > This is also now trac ticket #6663 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ >> > ticket/6663). >> >> There is also a more recent GLPK spkg >> athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6602, I believe. >> >> -Willem Jan > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
