Hi,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:03 PM, William Stein<wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Nick Alexander<ncalexan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> (2) integrate( f(x), (x,a,b) ) >>>> (3) integrate( f(x), x, a, b) >> >> Let's just choose one. I'm torn, but prefer (3) with a and b optional >> variables. >> >> Nick >> > > Hmm. If I had to choose one of these: > >> (1) integrate( f(x), x) >> (2) integrate( f(x), (x,a,b) ) >> (3) integrate( f(x), x, a, b) > > I would choose only (2) or (1) and get rid of (3)! Why? Simply > because that is far more consistent with plotting (which in turn was > meant to be consistent with Mathematica). I suspect 3 is more like > Maple. > > So I prefer (1) and (2). Personally, I too prefer (1) and (2) but we need to keep (3) (at least behind the scene as maxima would return in this form and we may need to re-use it) Cheers, Golam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
