Dear Craig,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:21:49PM -0700, Craig Citro wrote:
> > So how is the baby?????
> Very overdue! But she'll hopefully be here soon. ;)
So ????
She must have been here for a couple weeks now! How is it going?
> >> Honestly, I don't recall -- what was our plan for patching this in
> >> the interim? Or did we not decide on anything because we got
> >> sidetracked talking about #5986?
> >
> > We definitely got sidetracked talking about #5986 ...
> >
> > As far as I recall, the plan for #5985 was to just apply what's on
> > trac (i.e. one patch to import the cPickle sources and tests in the
> > sage tree and a 5 line patch on them), as a temporary measure until
> > things get fixed in python.
> >
>
> So I chatted with Robert Bradshaw about this, and he reminded me what
> we were talking about at SD15. Since this 5-line patch is one we
> expect to be upstreamed, we should just patch our python spkg instead
> of importing the cpickle file into the sage repo. I'll roll a new spkg
> shortly.
What's the status on this? The review of the category code itself is
finally nearing its end, so I am eager to see all the prerequisites go
in!
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
