This is a general question, but it applies to this spkg: is it appropriate for an spkg like this to inject its documentation into the Sage reference manual? My impression is that this package has good documentation, and it would be nice if it were available to the user when it's installed. The reference manual is the natural place. Should there be an "Optional packages" section of the reference manual, where each package can put its documentation?
John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
