> > * Someone spending his/her time improving the reference manual + > > constructions etc (similar to the tutorial idea) > > Can you please elaborate on this? > > Whatever time I could spare, I had devoted it to improving the > reference manual in the following ways: > > * spell-check any and all source files in the Sage library (Python and > Cython source files only) > > * add doctests and docstrings > > * add modules to the reference manual
Minh, I know that you and a few others spent considerable time with the docs and it helped enormously. In no way I meant to belittle those efforts! I think what should happen on top of this is that someone reads the reference manual and asks him/herself: if I wanted to use XYZ would this reference manual give me a clear picture of what Sage can do with it? I like the Magma reference manual (except that we have much more examples which is cool). Bottomline: If every page looked like your pages on the educational ciphers, we would be in much better shape! Cheers, Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
