On Oct 2, 11:06 pm, Tom Boothby <tomas.boot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is fixed in some trac ticket. Hang on a second... #5556. Go
> > ahead and review the patch!
>
> Nope, that doesn't do the job. Do you want to fix it on that ticket
> or should I make another?
Yeah, I remembered that this morning and realized that was only for
the negative integer case. Go ahead and open a different ticket,
since the solution is probably different. However, I think the
underlying problem is still the same - that CDF gamma (via Pari,
right?) is not as robust as one would like for real input. What
happens if you try to compute 1000! directly via Pari? I assume it
can handle that...
- kcrisman
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
