Hi Gonzalo, On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria <torna...@math.utexas.edu> wrote: > > For comparision, I'm using kvm to virtualize our sage notebook server. > Here's the timings for your scripts: > > A) the real hardware > > 0.196608066559 > 1 > > 0.191864967346 > -500000 > > B) the kvm instance > > 0.219820976257 (11.8% slowdown) > 1 > > 0.213951826096 (11.5% slowdown) > -500000
Interesting. Do you have some notes about your KVM setup? I want to try it as well, as the ubuntu guys seem to prefer it over virtualbox: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KVM I guess I'll follow this: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KVM/Installation as to: On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Martin Albrecht <m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote: > > I assume the VirtualBox image is 32-bit and your native OS is 64-bit? So it > isn't that surprising that computations with bigger numbers are somewhat > slower (13x is a bit much still, me thinks) Yes, it is 32bit Virtual box. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
