Also, if you find some different bug, here is a link to the bug tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=261188&atid=1240827
On Dec 16, 9:17 am, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 16, 3:57 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" <ma...@mendelu.cz> wrote: > > > On 15 pro, 08:47, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > > > > If you want to see a preview of the MathJax, next version of jsmath, > > > which Davide has been working on for a while, go to: > > > >http://www.mathjax.com/?page_id=13 > > > I have scattered tee in Firefox (2.0) and very bad rendering in Opera > > (9.63) > > Do you have in MathJax better math rendering than in jsmath? > > Not yet, I don't think, necessarily. But FF2 and Opera 9 are both > quite old, in browser terms (namely, FF2 is the only FF that works on > my six-year-old desktop, and even mine handles Opera 10), and I did > report this to them already. Here is the response: > > "In terms of your specific bugs, it turns out that a change I made > yesterday broke the image fallback method for when the client > doesn't > have the math fonts installed and their browser doesn't support > @font- > face web fonts." > > "Firefox 2 does not work with MathJax, and is not likely to in the > future. It does not handle the display:inline-block CSS style that > is > required for MathJax to properly size and position its elements. It > proprietary display:-moz-inline-box could possibly be used to > replace > it, but it is so buggy that I was not able to get it to operate > reliably, and had to give up no FF2 support. Once MathJax is out > and > stable, I can look again into extending to FF2, but for now, FF3 is > the minimum version. Sorry." > > Hope this helps. > > - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
