On 29 Dez., 15:17, Mike Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Well, after taking a look at file modules_list, would it be so bad if > > we were just adding at the end of the definition of this huge list : > > > if ( the correct library is installed ): > > ext_modules.append( whatever you want) > > > The problem just comes from the fact that this file is a very long > > list, and that we can not have conditions inside of this list, but > > that's all we need, isn't it ? > > Allowing optional extension modules that will fail gracefully has been > merged in distutils in Python 2.7. The patch looks pretty
+10 from my side for adding this feature to Sage (the "how" has yet to be discussed, why not use vanilla Python 2.7?) Cheers, Georg > straightforward to backport. The issue and changesets can be found > athttp://bugs.python.org/issue5583 > > --Mike -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
