Hello, Sage developpers ! I created a ticket to correct some annoying problem about documentation in graph theory http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8513
I can fix it myself, but I would like to have some opinions before doing so. The question is, should we just add the reference to these files without caring about Sphinx warnings (and correct them progressively) or is it better to fix all of them to the risk of having to rebase many patches still pending for reviews in graph theory ? Thank you ! Alex P.S. Here is the description of the ticket I noticed a few weeks ago while reviewing a patch that important files in the graph theory folder were not appearing anywhere in the reference manual. For instance, functions such as vertex_cut or edge_cut do not appear, as well as all functions defined only for directed graphs. At that time, I thought about adding the missing files with the patch, but since there were a lot of warnings displayed by Sphinx while generating the documentation, I changed my mind. I think it would be a good idea to use this ticket to fix this, but since it touches many files of graph theory, it may be hard to do it in a clean way. Someone has an idea of what would be the best approach ? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
