Hi Yuri, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:58 AM, yuri.k <yuri.karadz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately I have not enough resources to pay significant attention > to sage (despite I really want to). At least I can solve first problem > with desolve, but I still need some help to understand how to select > and check specific part of the symbolic expression, because the > solution I have is hell hard and I believe there is much easier one. > Anyway I wonder why the symbolic expression is not iterable and why > there isn't unified way to check its type.
I have no clue how to answer your query. Perhaps people on the sage-devel mailing list can help. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
