Hi Minh, Could be that a preliminary version of this post was already sent by accident -- sorry, if this was the case.
On 13 Jun., 12:00, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought I should share with you that the 90% doctest coverage goal > is moving very well. Great! >... > All of the above tickets have positive review! If anyone has some > time, here are some doctest tickets needing some attention: > > * #9222 databases/conway.py > * #9066 shapes2.py And there is also #8800, which raises the coverage of sage.categories.functor and sage.categories.pushout from 17% resp. 24% to 100%. However, it depends on #8807 -- both #8800 and #8807 need review (hint...). Note that this is one example how easy it is to find bugs while writing doc tests -- even in modules that *are* used (namely, these two modules are important for coercion). Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
