I added a basic script and some examples, plus some notes, to trac ticket
8048.

Jason

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Jason B Hill <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> This processor actually appears to be 64-bit capable, due to the "lm"
> (long-mode) flag.
>
> I confirmed this via the following link:
> http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=33916
>
> Thanks though. Any testing is good testing.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:51 PM, John Cremona <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> j...@ubuntu%cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "flags" | uniq
>> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
>> cmov
>> pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm
>> constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2
>> ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 lahf_lm ida
>>
>>
>> processor       : 0
>> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
>> cpu family      : 6
>> model           : 23
>> model name      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     T8100  @ 2.10GHz
>>
>>
>> On 15 July 2010 22:44, Jason B Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I only have access to 64-bit processors. (My 32-bit machine was recently
>> > stolen.) Can someone with a 32-bit processor (not just the OS, I need
>> the
>> > hardware itself to only support 32-bit) running any flavor of Linux
>> please
>> > copy and paste the result of the following shell command?
>> >
>> > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "flags" | uniq
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > I should have a testing version for at least Linux, and probably
>> Solaris, by
>> > the end of the day.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Jason
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Peter Jeremy <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 2010-Jul-01 13:09:30 -0600, "Jason B. Hill" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >What are others' thoughts on this? I can do a script as well, but only
>> >> > for
>> >> >Linux. I am also wondering how one would sort by OS, since it is my
>> >> >understanding that the main identifier (uname) is about as consistent
>> >> >between platforms as /etc/issue is between linux distros.
>> >>
>> >> I'd also prefer a shellscript because it has no dependencies on the
>> >> sage build process.  uname is defined by POSIX so it should be
>> >> possible to get general output using system-independent code (though
>> >> the actual strings reported may vary from OS to OS).  CPU and memory
>> >> information is more OS-dependent but it shouldn't be too difficult to
>> >> write a script (with system-dependent bits) to extract this
>> >> information.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Peter Jeremy
>> >
>> > --
>> > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
>> > [email protected]<sage-devel%[email protected]>
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
>> > URL: http://www.sagemath.org
>> >
>>
>> --
>> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
>> [email protected]<sage-devel%[email protected]>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
>> URL: http://www.sagemath.org
>>
>
>

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to