Hello, Carl. You wrote 3 августа 2010 г., 6:39:49: > I've attached a patch to make alglib allow input in the following formats: > * boolean vector/matrix: GF(2), RDF, numpy.bool, numpy.float64 > * integer vector/matrix: RDF, numpy.int32, numpy.float64 > * real: RDF, numpy.float64 > * complex: CDF, numpy.complex128 > This is entirely untested, except that the following examples (adapted > from your "ALGLIB for Sage" page, and modified to use Sage or numpy > types) work:
Thanks! I am working on modification of check.py (Python-ALGLIB communication tests). Currently it tries to pass Python lists between Python(Sage) and ALGLIB. I want to make it use Python lists, numpy arrays, Sage vectors/matrices (each function will be tested with all these types). It should autodetect types of all variables, so you will be able to rewrite *_vector_from_x/*_matrix_from_x one by one (rewrite bool_vector_from_x, launch unit test, rewrite next function). I'll release new test suite tomorrow. > But this raises another API question... should bool_matrix_from_x > return a matrix over GF(2) or over RDF? Hmmm... I prefer GF(2), but I think that it in most part is just a matter of taste :) -- With best regards, Sergey mailto:sergey.bochka...@alglib.net -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
