Right, but it may have finished within 5 seconds and proceeded on to something that is interruptable. David
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 14:53, Jeroen Demeyer <[email protected]>wrote: > On 2010-10-17 20:49, David Roe wrote: > > I suspect that this is aimed at C-computations that are not wrapped in a > > _sig_on _sig_off pair. Such code should be wrapped if it's going to > > take substantial time, but since it isn't always, two interrupts are > sent. > > If the code isn't wrapped in sig_on()/sig_off() (note the syntax change > at #10115), then sending two or more interrupts isn't going to help > either... > > Jeroen. > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > [email protected]<sage-devel%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
