On Feb 25, 10:36 am, rjf <fate...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 24, 9:57 pm, Ira Baxter <idbax...@semdesigns.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 23, 11:37 am, rjf <fate...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 23, 9:17 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > On 02/22/11 10:57 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > > > > > On 02/22/11 03:49 PM, rjf wrote: > > > [snip]. The real difficulty is > > > > >> to implement a Mathematica language parser, since the language > > > > >> fails to fit the standard expectations for computer languages. > > > > yet someone from a commercial company selling this DMS toolkit claims > > > > the language is not particularly difficult to parse, and have a front > > > > end for > > > > their toolkit (a GLR parser) able to parse Mathematica. > > > > Here are my suggestions: > > > > 1. The guy is lying. He doesn't really have a Mathematica parser that > > > works.
It is clear that Fateman with no evidence insulted our ability to parse Mathematica, as well as our character. It should be clear that we can parse it just fine. You can decide about our character. Mr. Fateman does not apparantly understand what we do with our tools, or how they work. Given the way this conversation started, and the way he is continuing, I see no good reason why I should explain any of this to him. -- IDB -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
